DEMO ENVIRONMENT · sample data for “Northwind Global” · restart tour
Dana Whitfield

For the board

Board report

The three questions a board asks every time — where’s the value, what to invest in, how you compare — answered from behavioral evidence across Northwind Global’s connected data.

AIDE Index
64.3Advancing
Employees
41800
AI agents in production
182
1

Where's the value?

$38,875,900
est. annualized labor value from AI activity
$58,400,000
new revenue attributed to AI go-to-market & sales
409,220h
human hours redirected
4,092,200
measured AI agent actions
228
live AI opportunities tracked

Value is two-sided: cost saved (observed agent actions, ≈6 min of human time each at a blended $75/h — not surveys) and revenue created — pipeline sourced/influenced by AI agents in go-to-market and sales, joined to closed-won CRM deals.

2

What investments are needed?

  1. AI Team Adoption (21/100 — your weakest)
    Facilities & Manufacturing sit at near-zero AI literacy — fund foundational enablement there first; it is the single biggest workforce-score drag.
  2. AI Team Literacy (46/100 — the frozen middle)
    Upskill the manager band across Finance, Legal, Operations & Supply Chain — it lags both the executives above and the ICs below it.
  3. AI Implementation (71/100 — a strength to press)
    You are strong here (71/100) — this is a lever, not a gap. Scale the top-performing agent patterns from Data & AI into the thin-adoption functions to compound the return.
  4. AI Advocacy (69/100 — a strategic bet)
    Leadership advocacy is already high (69) — fund an executive AI-advocacy program and external thought leadership to widen the moat against AI-native entrants while the lead exists.

Prioritized by impact against state-of-the-art AI-native practices — a mix of gap-closing, high-leverage strengths to press, and strategic bets. Not every priority is a weakness.

3

How do we compare to competitors?

71th percentile
vs the 480-company S&P 500 AIDE cohort
ServiceNow · 68Snowflake · 66HubSpot · 64Datadog · 61Twilio · 57

AI maturity — seniority × department (for CHRO / L&D)

TechnologyData & AIProductRevenueOperationsFinancePeopleLegal & ComplianceManufacturingFacilities
Executive54%75%66%44%39%38%50%43%9%5%
VP64%60%61%42%37%29%33%32%9%5%
Director72%68%58%51%46%42%47%42%6%5%
Manager58%63%52%43%36%33%34%32%6%5%
Individual contributor72%72%61%55%47%43%44%34%9%6%

Greener = higher observed AI engagement. Red cells are L&D priorities — target AI-literacy programs there to lift the weakest areas.

Top AI use cases by function

Use case (agent)FunctionOwnerActions
Access Provisioner · crewaiInformation TechnologyOksana Dubois46,869
Deal Desk Agent · EMEA · crewaiRevenueFelix Fernandez46,602
Close Assistant · langchainFinancePriya Moreno46,572
Experiment Runner · customData & AIHugo Petrenko46,084
CodeReview Copilot · NA · lindyTechnologyDana Santos45,930
Competitive Intel Agent · n8nMarketingPablo Okonkwo45,906
Expense Auditor · EMEA · customFinanceElena Doyle45,889
Expense Auditor · NA · n8nFinancePablo Okonkwo45,206
Lead Qualifier · NA · lindyRevenueRaj Nair45,084
Drift Monitor · EMEA · crewaiData & AIKeiko Foster44,567
Expense Auditor · lindyFinanceCarlos Petrova44,522
Forecast Builder · EMEA · lyzrFinanceNoor Muller43,839
Revenue Forecaster · customRevenueIngrid Zhang43,567
DeployBot · langchainTechnologyOmar Patel43,560
Territory Planner · EMEA · crewaiRevenueDana Santos43,536

That’s the tour. Jump back to the Dashboard or restart.